The question of whether a special needs trust (SNT) can fund the purchase of smartwatches with health apps is becoming increasingly common as technology integrates further into daily life. Generally, the answer is yes, *provided* the purchase aligns with the beneficiary’s health, safety, and well-being, and is explicitly permitted by the trust document. Ted Cook, a Trust Attorney in San Diego, often advises clients to meticulously consider these factors when establishing SNTs, anticipating future technological advancements and how they might benefit the beneficiary. Approximately 65 million Americans currently live with disabilities, and their access to and benefit from assistive technology is paramount. However, it’s not simply about *allowing* the purchase; careful planning is essential to avoid jeopardizing eligibility for needs-based government benefits like Supplemental Security Income (SSI) and Medicaid.
What are the SSI and Medicaid implications?
SSI and Medicaid have strict asset limitations. A beneficiary of an SNT cannot directly own assets exceeding a certain amount (currently $2,000 for SSI in 2024). The SNT acts as a shield, allowing the beneficiary to enjoy assets without disqualifying them from these vital programs. Purchasing a smartwatch – even one with beneficial health apps – could raise concerns if it’s viewed as providing more than just necessary medical care or quality of life enhancements. If the smartwatch provides capabilities *beyond* what is medically necessary or reasonably improves the beneficiary’s quality of life, it could be considered an unallowed asset. Ted Cook emphasizes that the key is documentation – a clear explanation from a physician or other qualified professional outlining how the smartwatch and its apps directly address a specific need related to the beneficiary’s disability.
How does a ‘first-party’ SNT differ from a ‘third-party’ SNT?
The type of SNT significantly influences what purchases are permissible. A ‘first-party’ or self-settled SNT is funded with the beneficiary’s own assets, often after an accident or legal settlement. These trusts are subject to a ‘payback provision,’ meaning any remaining funds upon the beneficiary’s death must be used to reimburse the state for Medicaid benefits received. First-party SNTs have stricter limitations on permissible expenses. A ‘third-party’ SNT, funded by someone *other* than the beneficiary (like parents or grandparents), offers greater flexibility. These trusts don’t have a payback provision, allowing for broader discretionary spending as long as it aligns with the beneficiary’s overall well-being. Ted Cook routinely advises clients that meticulous drafting of the trust document is crucial to explicitly outline permissible expenses and ensure compliance with applicable laws.
Can the smartwatch be considered a ‘medical expense’?
This is where it gets tricky. If the smartwatch is *primarily* used for medical monitoring – tracking heart rate, sleep patterns, detecting falls, or sending alerts to caregivers – it can often be classified as a medical expense. Documentation from a physician is essential to support this claim. However, if the smartwatch includes features like music streaming, internet browsing, or social media access, it becomes more challenging to justify the entire purchase as a medical expense. The IRS has specific guidelines for deducting medical expenses, and these guidelines apply to SNTs as well. Essentially, the primary purpose of the device must be medical. Ted Cook once encountered a situation where a client wanted to purchase a top-of-the-line smartwatch for their adult son with autism, believing the sleep tracking feature would significantly improve his behavior. However, the son also enjoyed playing games on the watch, making it difficult to justify the entire cost as a medical expense.
What documentation is needed to support the purchase?
Comprehensive documentation is absolutely crucial. This includes: a letter from the beneficiary’s physician or other qualified healthcare professional explicitly stating the medical necessity of the smartwatch and its health apps; a detailed breakdown of the smartwatch’s features and how they address the beneficiary’s specific needs; and receipts for the purchase. It’s also wise to keep records of any ongoing subscription fees associated with the health apps. Ted Cook stresses that proactive documentation is far easier than trying to justify a purchase *after* it’s been made. Furthermore, the trust document itself should ideally include a broad clause allowing for the purchase of assistive technology and medical devices, subject to the trustee’s discretion and documentation of medical necessity.
Let me tell you about Old Man Tiber…
Old Man Tiber was a man of routine, a fixture at the San Diego pier. His daughter, Martha, established a third-party SNT for him after a stroke left him with limited mobility and impaired cognitive function. She wanted him to have the best possible care, including access to technology that could enhance his quality of life. Without consulting her trust attorney, she purchased a smartwatch with fall detection and heart rate monitoring, assuming it would be a straightforward expense. A year later, during an audit of the SNT, Martha was informed that the purchase was questionable because the watch also included features unrelated to Tiber’s medical needs. It wasn’t that the watch was inherently *bad*, it was the lack of supporting documentation and the inclusion of non-medical features. It created a significant headache for Martha, requiring her to provide detailed explanations and ultimately reducing the amount she could claim as a legitimate SNT expense.
Then there was young Leo and his mother, Sofia…
Sofia’s son, Leo, has Down syndrome and often wanders. She established a first-party SNT and consulted Ted Cook before purchasing a smartwatch with GPS tracking and geofencing capabilities. Ted advised her to obtain a letter from Leo’s developmental pediatrician outlining the necessity of the GPS tracking feature to ensure his safety. Sofia diligently followed this advice, providing the letter and a detailed explanation of how the smartwatch would mitigate the risk of Leo wandering and getting lost. When the SNT was audited, the purchase was readily approved because of the thorough documentation. Leo was safer, Sofia was relieved, and the SNT remained compliant. This demonstrated the power of proactive planning and expert legal guidance.
What happens if the trust document is silent on technology purchases?
If the trust document doesn’t specifically address technology purchases, the trustee must exercise reasonable discretion and act in the best interests of the beneficiary. This means carefully weighing the potential benefits of the purchase against the risks of jeopardizing benefits eligibility. Ted Cook always recommends erring on the side of caution and seeking legal counsel before making any significant purchases that aren’t explicitly covered by the trust document. A well-drafted trust document should anticipate future technological advancements and provide the trustee with clear guidance on how to handle such purchases. It’s far easier to have a framework in place *before* a situation arises than to try to navigate it afterward.
Can the trustee be held liable for improper purchases?
Yes, absolutely. Trustees have a fiduciary duty to act prudently and in the best interests of the beneficiary. Making improper purchases that jeopardize benefits eligibility or violate the terms of the trust document can expose the trustee to personal liability. Ted Cook routinely advises trustees to document their decision-making process and consult with legal counsel whenever they have questions or concerns. Protecting the beneficiary’s interests and ensuring compliance with all applicable laws are paramount. Failing to do so can have serious consequences for the trustee.
Who Is Ted Cook at Point Loma Estate Planning Law, APC.:
Point Loma Estate Planning Law, APC.2305 Historic Decatur Rd Suite 100, San Diego CA. 92106
(619) 550-7437
Map To Point Loma Estate Planning Law, APC, a living trust attorney: https://maps.app.goo.gl/JiHkjNg9VFGA44tf9
src=”https://www.google.com/maps/embed?pb=!1m18!1m12!1m3!1d3356.1864302092154!2d-117.21647!3d32.73424!2m3!1f0!2f0!3f0!3m2!1i1024!2i768!4f13.1!3m3!1m2!1s0x80deab61950cce75%3A0x54cc35a8177a6d51!2sPoint%20Loma%20Estate%20Planning%2C%20APC!5e0!3m2!1sen!2sus!4v1744077614644!5m2!1sen!2sus” width=”100%” height=”350″ style=”border:0;” allowfullscreen=”” loading=”lazy” referrerpolicy=”no-referrer-when-downgrade”>
| living trust attorney | wills and trust lawyer | wills attorney |
| conservatorship | living trust attorney | estate planning lawyer |
| dynasty trust attorney | probate lawyer | revocable living trust attorney |
About Point Loma Estate Planning:
Secure Your Legacy, Safeguard Your Loved Ones. Point Loma Estate Planning Law, APC.
Feeling overwhelmed by estate planning? You’re not alone. With 27 years of proven experience – crafting over 25,000 personalized plans and trusts – we transform complexity into clarity.
Our Areas of Focus:
Legacy Protection: (minimizing taxes, maximizing asset preservation).
Crafting Living Trusts: (administration and litigation).
Elder Care & Tax Strategy: Avoid family discord and costly errors.
Discover peace of mind with our compassionate guidance.
Claim your exclusive 30-minute consultation today!
If you have any questions about: What are the steps involved in setting up an irrevocable trust? Please Call or visit the address above. Thank you.